Contact
Send mail to the author(s) Email Me

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in any way.

Sign In
Navigation

Tag Cloud
.NET Framework (33) AJAX (9) ASP.NET (16) ASP.NET MVC (3) Azure (1) C# (35) Cloud (3) Database (7) Dev Community (2) Dev Tools (7) Enterprise Library (2) Extensions (1) Futures (2) General (6) IIS (1) Infrastructure (1) Javascript (7) LINQ (2) Mobile (1) MSDTC (6) Queuing (1) Quotes (5) SQL (5) Transactions (6) Visual Studio (3) WAS (2) WCF (24) WIF (1)

Archive
<October 2009>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
27282930123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
1234567

Categories

Blogroll
Home Feed your aggregator (RSS 2.0)
# Thursday, October 08, 2009
Thursday, October 08, 2009 12:51:21 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #    Comments [1]   MSDTC | Transactions | WCF  | 
# Wednesday, September 02, 2009
The 2009 Jacksonville Code Camp was a great success. Many thanks to Bayer, Brandy, and everyone else that made it happen. The bar has been set really high for future Jacksonville code camps, and for the rest of Florida too.

My session on Transactional WCF Services went well. Many great questions and compliments after the session. If you attended and have any unanswered questions, please email me.

You can download the session files below. It contains staged versions of all of the transaction modes we discussed. It also contains a tracing solution and tracing result files to view the client and host tracing files in Client/Service mode. Also see my previous post on using the Service Trace Viewer. It also contains a few demo projects that we didn't get to in the one-hour session.

Files/Solutions included in Session Archive:
  • PowerPoint slides
  • Transaction Promotion Code Snippet
  • Testing database backup
  • Testing SQL script (query and cleanup between tests)
  • IDesign ServiceModelEx Project (used by all included Solutions)
  • Code Demo Solutions

Code Demos include:

1. TransactionScope - Shows how single/multiple resource managers affect which Transaction Manager is chosen to handle the scoped transaction. Also gives first look at transaction promotion detection.
2a. Mode None - WCF transaction mode with which no transactions are created or flowed from the calling client.
2b. Mode Service - WCF transaction mode with which no transactions are flowed from the calling client, but a transaction is created for your service operation.
2c. Mode Client - WCF transaction mode with which a transaction is required to be flowed, and the service will only use the client transaction.
2d. Mode Client/Service - WCF transaction mode with which a client transaction will be flowed and used by the service, if available. If no client transaction is flowed, a transaction will be provided automatically for the service operation.
3. Explicit Voting - Shows how explicit voting with a session-mode service is performed using OperationContext.Current.SetTransactionComplete().
4a. Testing Various Resource Managers - Shows how a client can use a single TransactionScope to call several services (some transactional, some non-transactional), a database stored procedure, and an IDesign volatile resource manager Transactional<int>.
4b. Testing Services - Provides a host project for a transactional service and a non-transactional service used in 4a.
5a. Tracing - Same as 2d. modified with the additional app.config settings in the client and host projects to allow for service tracing to .svclog files.
5b. Tracing Results - Stored results from executing 5a. in case you don't want to load the database and actually run the projects. The .stvproj file can be opened directly in the Service Trace Viewer. On the "Activity" table, click on the activity "Process action 'http://services/gotjeep.net/GpsTrackServiceContract/SubmitTrack'" then click on the "Graph" tab. You will see that the client and host activities where the arrow moves from client to host (send and receive message, respectively) show the OleTxTransaction in "Headers." The next activity in the host reads "The transaction '5bd25b08-848c-409d-9163-6303b9138382:1' was flowed to operation 'SubmitTrack'."

 

Download the session files:
TransactionalWCF.zip (854 KB)

Wednesday, September 02, 2009 10:34:34 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #    Comments [1]   .NET Framework | C# | Dev Community | Dev Tools | MSDTC | Transactions | WCF  | 
# Wednesday, July 15, 2009

JaxDug is doing something different this year having all sponsorship proceeds benefiting Wolfson’s Children Hospital. In addition to the sponsorship surplus going to Wolfson’s, there will also be a silent auction at the after-party at Sneaker’s Sports Grille.

There is a great session lineup with eight tracks having five hour-long sessions in each track. I’ll be presenting one session on Transactional WCF Services. It’s guaranteed to be a good geeky time, and I hope it will have record attendance this year.

 Register now!

Tuesday, July 14, 2009 11:06:22 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #    Comments [2]   Dev Community | General | WCF  | 
# Tuesday, April 14, 2009

I really like the manifesto’s web site! In the following post, MLB comments on the Open Cloud Manifesto.

http://www.dasblonde.net/2009/03/31/TheOpenCloudManifestoWhatIThink.aspx

Tuesday, April 14, 2009 6:03:48 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #    Comments [9]   Cloud  | 
# Saturday, April 11, 2009

Important, proven, and universally-useful technologies like WCF and Mobile are still not well-known in the development community. Many believe there is another boom, similar to the 1992 Internet boom, on the horizon that will require skilled and knowledgeable developers to engineer the framework and associated connecting systems. Staying tech-current and adapting to our new world is an absolute necessity. Don’t become the COBOL programmer of the future. Knowing these great system-connecting technologies (WCF, Mobile, Cloud, etc.) will quickly become a requirement to compete in the software industry.

Check out the following interview with Richard Campbell (DotNetRocks, RunAs Radio) and Juval Lowy (IDesign) talking about the EnergyNet at the DevConnections conference. The growing hype about alternative energy and the EnergyNet is stunning. Technology has progressed far enough where we can start to tie together disparate systems to benefit producers and consumers alike.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4831440850220717845

Saturday, April 11, 2009 7:51:30 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #    Comments [4]   .NET Framework | Futures | Mobile | WCF  | 
# Wednesday, January 28, 2009

“Do not anticipate trouble, or worry about what may never happen. Keep in the sunlight.”

 

- Benjamin Franklin

 

It’s obvious that Mr. Franklin didn’t have to deal with bad data, bad code, or even the occasional hiccup. In the real world, there is “trouble” and we need to not only anticipate that trouble, but also worry about what may never happen. Simply “keeping in the sunlight” won’t maintain data or application state integrity. In the real world we need transactions!

 

Since .NET 2.0, we’ve had the privilege of using System.Transactions.TransactionScope to manage our transactions with very few headaches. One of the headaches that almost everyone experiences is MSDTC. One of the oldest and most elusive topics on the web. There are tons of blog and forum posts directing our fellow developers to check their firewall settings for every MSDTC problem. The latest MSDTC hiccup I have seen comes in the beautifully packaged error message:

The flowed transaction could not be unmarshaled. The following exception occurred: Communication with the underlying transaction manager has failed.

The what could not be what? You can read some MSDN documentation on the topic which will probably cause you more pain. If you are seeing this error message, there’s only a few things that may be wrong.

  1. MSDTC Settings
    • Check the MSDTC settings on the machine that is initiating the transaction. If “Allow Outbound” is not checked, then it won’t allow the transaction in progress to be flowed to the next machine in the transaction chain. Check the box and restart MSDTC… it should work.
  2. Un-Trusted Domains
    • I have seen this error when you are trying to flow transactions between machines that are in un-trusted domains. Machines in different domains that do not trust each other block the antiquated, yet necessary, WINS resolution between the two machines. MSDTC relies on WINS resolution. I have fixed this problem before by adding host file entries on both machines pointing to the other machine. I can’t guarantee that this will work in all cases. Both of those machines are no longer under my control.
  3. Imaged Servers
    • The most recent, and most blogged about problem is surprisingly caused by two machines created from the same image. Cloning or imaging servers is quite common. Building a server from scratch is not a fun activity, so we build one, create an image, and put that image on every server we want to build after that. Once again, MSDTC is standing in our way because of the way it detects the sending and receiving application’s unique identifier. Each machine has a GUID in the registry that identifies it uniquely as a participant in an MSDTC transaction. Imaged machines have the same GUID. I’ll talk about the detection and resolution of this for the remainder of this post.

Running DtcPing.exe between the two machines will actually tell you that the machines are using the same GUID. Output window text from DtcPing shown below.

DTCping log file: C:\DTC Ping\THRESHER4160.log
Firewall Port Settings:
Port:5150-5250
RPC server is ready
Please Start Partner DTCping before pinging
WARNING:the CID values for both test machines are the same
Please send following LOG to Microsoft for analysis:
Partner LOG: SCORPION6128.log
My LOG: THRESHER4160.log

Tucked away in the last step of a Microsoft Knowledge Base article titled "How to troubleshoot MS DTC firewall issues" is a reference to this problem. Use regedit.exe to look at the registry on both machines. Locate the HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CID key in the registry.

Find your MSDTC CID in the registry

Find the CID key that has a description value of “MSDTC”. If they are the same, the transaction cannot flow.

WARNING: Back up your registry before making any changes!

Solution 1 - Replace the offending CID keys/values on one of the machines: In this case, you will need to find all keys/values with GUID 28b81f1c-2afb-4ee2-ad85-5bc62dad1647 in your registry and replace it with a new GUID (using GuidGen). There is likely to be 3 places this GUID appears. It is also important to note that the offending GUID appears in the DtcPing log file generated during the ping test.

Solution 2 – Use msdtc command line tool to re-install MSDTC: The commands are simply:

msdtc -uninstall
msdtc -install

After making the registry changes or running the msdtc command line tool, you must restart your server for the changes to take effect.

Wednesday, January 28, 2009 9:39:52 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #    Comments [7]   .NET Framework | MSDTC | Quotes | Transactions | WCF  | 
# Sunday, January 04, 2009

"To achieve great things, two things are needed; a plan, and not quite enough time."

 

- Leonard Bernstein

Sunday, January 04, 2009 8:59:30 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #    Comments [9]   Quotes  | 
# Saturday, December 06, 2008

It's so easy! Start downloading Enterprise Library 4.1 now while you read this. The data application block syntax has not changed much since the first version. The most notable change was allowing us to use System.Data.Common.DbCommand when version 3.0 was released. I understand the uneasy feeling some developers have using Enterprise Library. My team at my previous employer decided not to use it, thinking it would add increased complexity and would not give us the flexibility we needed if we had to change something. This is typical of groups that do not have an established Data Access Library.

Your Data Access Library should be one of the most highly tested libraries in your application. If there is a problem there, you will have issues everywhere. Enterprise Library not only comes with the source code, but also includes the full suite of unit tests for each of the application blocks. You should feel at ease when you decide to migrate to Enterprise Library. Run it through your full battery of tests before you commit the team to it. If you find any problems, check the forums, request changes/enhancements from the MS Patterns & Practices team, or fix it yourself.

The steps to achieve EntLib goodness:

  1. Download Enterprise Library
  2. Add reference to "Enterprise Library Data Access Application Block" and "Enterprise Library Shared Library"
  3. Change your app.config or web.config
  4. Write some much more readable data access code

I'll start at step 3 as steps 1 and 2 are self-explanatory. Your connection string needs to be in you app's config file, the machine.config file, or in a connectionStrings.config file referenced in those config files. You can start using it just by adding the <configSections> clock and the <dataConfiguration> node. This will allow you to have one default database for all commands you will execute.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<configuration>

    <configSections>

        <section name="dataConfiguration" type="Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.Data.Configuration.DatabaseSettings, Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.Data, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35" />

    </configSections>

    <dataConfiguration defaultDatabase="Testing" />

    <connectionStrings>

        <add name="Testing" connectionString="server=Server_Name;database=DB_Name;Integrated Security=true;"

                  providerName="System.Data.SqlClient" />

    </connectionStrings>
</configuration>

 

By the time you get to step 4, you have all of the infrastructure in place. Painless so far, let's see how steep the learning curve is.

With ADO.NET, you would write:

  116 string connectionString = ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["Testing"].ConnectionString;

  117 using (SqlConnection con = new SqlConnection(connectionString))

  118 using (SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand("usp_ErrorLog_Insert", con))

  119 {

  120     cmd.CommandType = System.Data.CommandType.StoredProcedure;

  121     cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("Message", "Testing 1");

  122     cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("UserID", 5150);

  123     try

  124     {

  125         con.Open();

  126         cmd.ExecuteNonQuery();

  127     }

  128     finally

  129     {

  130         con.Close();

  131     }

  132 }

With Enterprise Library, you write:

  170 Database db = DatabaseFactory.CreateDatabase();

  171 DbCommand cmd = db.GetStoredProcCommand("usp_ErrorLog_Insert");

  172 db.AddInParameter(cmd, "Message", System.Data.DbType.String, "Testing 1");

  173 db.AddInParameter(cmd, "UserID", System.Data.DbType.Int32, 5150);

  174 db.ExecuteNonQuery(cmd);

 

Line 170 creates the database object. This is the hardest thing to get used to. You call everything related to the Database object. In ADO.NET, we are used to creating a connection, adding the connection to a command, using the command in an adapter. Here you'll always be using the Database object to create a command, add parameters to the command, execute the command, fill a DataSet, etc. It is definitely less code to write, but it is also more readable and elegant.

If you have a database to execute commands against other than the defaultDatabase specified in the config file, then the first line changes to:

  170 Database db = DatabaseFactory.CreateDatabase("OtherConnectionStringKey");

 

That's it. The patterns & practices team has really done a nice job making it painless to use Enterprise Library. Take the time to try it out again if you reviewed a previous version. I reviewed 2.0, and chose not to use it. When 3.0 came out, I was hooked.

Saturday, December 06, 2008 11:09:10 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #    Comments [6]   C# | Enterprise Library  | 
Copyright © 2010 Scott Klueppel. All rights reserved.