Contact
Send mail to the author(s) Email Me

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in any way.

Sign In
Navigation

Tag Cloud
.NET Framework (31) AJAX (9) ASP.NET (16) ASP.NET MVC (3) C# (32) Cloud (2) Database (6) Dev Community (2) Dev Tools (5) Enterprise Library (1) Futures (2) General (6) Javascript (7) LINQ (2) Mobile (1) MSDTC (5) Quotes (3) SQL (3) Transactions (4) Visual Studio (3) WAS (2) WCF (19) WIF (1)

Archive
<October 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
2829301234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930311
2345678

Categories

Blogroll
Home Feed your aggregator (RSS 2.0)
# Sunday, September 21, 2008

WCF never ceases to amaze me. Around every corner is another fascinating use for WCF, and much forethought on Microsoft's part to make it look and behave great. I wanted to expose my services to my AJAX functions on my web site. I did not want to change my class library because it is used by other clients. I could just add the service classes to this web site, but why re-do when you can re-use.

If you have an existing WCF Service Library, you will need to expose it with the AspNetCompatibilityRequirementsMode.Allowed attribute on the service class to make it visible to ASP.NET clients. To avoid changing your service library in any way, the easiest thing to do is to add a new class to your web site that inherits from your service class. In this example, my existing service library uses the JeepServices namespace. Notice there is no implementation in this class. It is simply a placeholder for the real service implementation with the compatibility attribute attached.

    1 using System.ServiceModel;

    2 using System.ServiceModel.Activation;

    3 

    4 [ServiceBehavior]

    5 [AspNetCompatibilityRequirements(RequirementsMode = AspNetCompatibilityRequirementsMode.Allowed)]

    6 public class WebHttpService : JeepServices.Service

    7 {

    8 }

Now that I have a ASP.NET compatible service, I need to expose it to the web site clients. Create a service file (.svc), and change the Service and CodeBehind attributes to point to the .svc file. The last thing you need is the Factory attribute. This notifies WCF of this service, eliminating the need for a configuration file entry for the service endpoint. In fact, you don't even need the <system.servicemodel> in your configuration file at all. This is because it is only hosted as a web script, and cannot be called outside of the web site.

    1 <%@ ServiceHost Language="C#" Debug="true" Service="WebHttpService" CodeBehind="~/App_Code/WebHttpService.cs"

    2     Factory="System.ServiceModel.Activation.WebScriptServiceHostFactory" %>

 

In your web page you will need a few things. First your will need a ScriptManager with a ServiceReference to the .svc file. You will then need the Javascript functions to make the call (DoJeepWork), handle the success message (OnJeepWorkSucceeded), and handle the failure message (OnJeepWorkFailed). Notice in DoJeepWork that you don't call the service by it's service name WebHttpService, you call it by the ServiceContract namespace and name. For this example, my interface has ServiceContract attributes Namespace = "JeepServices", and Name = "JeepServiceContract". Now you just wire up a ASP.NET control's OnClientClick or an input or anchor tag's onclick to DoJeepWork() and you are good to go.

    1 <%@ Page Language="C#" AutoEventWireup="true" CodeFile="Default.aspx.cs" Inherits="_Default" %>

    2 

    3 <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"

    4 "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">

    5 <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

    6 <head runat="server">

    7     <title>Test page</title>

    8 

    9     <script type="text/javascript">

   10         function DoJeepWork() {

   11             JeepServices.JeepServiceContract.DoWork(OnJeepWorkSuccedeed, OnJeepWorkFailed);

   12         }

   13         function OnJeepWorkSuccedeed(res) {

   14             document.getElementById("<%= this.lblMessage.ClientID %>").innerText = res;

   15         }

   16         function OnJeepWorkFailed(error) {

   17             // Alert user to the error.   

   18             alert(error.get_message());

   19         }

   20     </script>

   21 

   22 </head>

   23 <body>

   24     <form id="form1" runat="server">

   25     <div>

   26         <asp:ScriptManager runat="server">

   27             <Services>

   28                 <asp:ServiceReference Path="~/Services/WebHttpService.svc" InlineScript="false" />

   29             </Services>

   30         </asp:ScriptManager>

   31         <asp:Label ID="lblMessage" runat="server" Text="No work has been done" />

   32         <a href="javascript:void(0); DoJeepWork()">Do Work</a>

   33     </div>

   34     </form>

   35 </body>

   36 </html>

 

Mission accomplished! Here you've seen how to expose an existing WCF service library without changing any code in the library itself. Adding two files allowed the service to be exposed to your AJAX clients. Best of all, there is no configuration file changes to make.

Useful Links:

Sunday, September 21, 2008 11:21:24 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #    Comments [9]   .NET Framework | AJAX | ASP.NET | C# | Javascript | WCF  | 
# Tuesday, September 16, 2008

Hosting an MSMQ service is a little bit different than the other bindings. Since WCF is using MSMQ as a transport mechanism, you must setup the queues, permissions, and bindingConfigurations to allow this to happen. Surprisingly, MSDN has a good sample article that goes into sufficient detail on how to set this up for the 3.5 WF-WCF-CardSpace samples.

I have read in other articles that the AppPool must have an interactive identity and that the queue names needed to match the name of the .svc file. I did not find this to be the case. I was able to use the NetworkService account for my AppPool after adding receive and peek permissions for NetworkService on my queue. Communication between client and WAS worked fine with my service file named WasServices.svc and my queue address as net.msmq://localhost/private/QueuedService1.

You can download my solution with the following link: WasServices.zip (78K)

Additional Info:

Tuesday, September 16, 2008 8:48:22 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #    Comments [5]   .NET Framework | C# | WAS | WCF  | 
# Saturday, September 13, 2008

It has taken me weeks to get WAS (Windows Activation Service) working. Finally, tonight, my long hours of research has paid off. After everything I tried, it turned out to be a general IIS7 issue caused by a stray http reservation that I probably entered months ago during some testing. As I primarily use the built-in development server for web development, I rarely crank up an IIS site on my development machine.

This post by Phil Haack helped me fix my IIS install:

http://haacked.com/archive/2007/05/21/the-iis-7-team-rocks.aspx

I have been cursing IIS7, Vista, and WAS for weeks. I should have been cursing my own lack of IIS7 knowledge all along. Now that it's working, I am a big fan of WAS. From the tone of recent forum responses and blog posts, very few people are using WAS. Maybe it is due to Windows Server 2008 being so new. Not many people have Vista workstations for development and all Windows Server 2008 servers to deploy to. Knowing how many problems I had, I can only assume others are experiencing the same thing. The only real info available right now is pre-release articles and MVP posts about the new features with a sneak peak example on how to get it to work. Even MSDN doesn't show how to use an existing WCF Service Library with WAS. They just walk through a WsHttpBinding example as a new WCF web site served up by WAS.

I'm posting the details so others will maybe see that it's really not that hard. For this example I want to expose this service with the NetTcpBinding to prove that it is not IIS hosting the service. I used the WCF Service Library project template for my WCF service, and named the project WasServices. So the lame Service1 service is all I have in the library. I made no changes to the project and built it in release mode to get the DLL. Some posts and articles out there say that the only way to get WAS to work is to have an HTTP-based WCF web site. This is simply not true. You just need to have an application set up in IIS.

Here is the steps to success:

1. Enable the required Windows Features to wake up IIS7 and WAS. You will find these in the helpful links below.

2. Configuration file C:\Windows\System32\inetsrv\config\applicationHost.config must be modified to enable the required protocols on your web site and application. You can modify the file yourself, or use command-line utilities.

To enable net.tcp on the web site, if it is not already:

%windir%\system32\inetsrv\appcmd.exe set site "Default Web Site" -+bindings.[protocol='net.tcp',bindingInformation='808:*']

To enable net.tcp on your application (my app is named WasServices) within that web site, if it is not already:

%windir%\system32\inetsrv\appcmd.exe set app "Default Web Site/WasServices" /enabledProtocols:http,net.tcp

Here is an exerpt from the applicationHost.config file showing the site and application settings:

  151             <site name="Default Web Site" id="1" serverAutoStart="true">

  152                 <application path="/">

  153                     <virtualDirectory path="/" physicalPath="%SystemDrive%\inetpub\wwwroot" />

  154                 </application>

  155                 <application path="/WasServices" applicationPool="WasHosting" enabledProtocols="http,net.tcp">

  156                     <virtualDirectory path="/" physicalPath="C:\inetpub\wwwroot\WasServices" />

  157                 </application>

  158                 <bindings>

  159                     <binding protocol="net.tcp" bindingInformation="808:*" />

  160                     <binding protocol="net.pipe" bindingInformation="*" />

  161                     <binding protocol="net.msmq" bindingInformation="localhost" />

  162                     <binding protocol="msmq.formatname" bindingInformation="localhost" />

  163                     <binding protocol="http" bindingInformation="*:80:" />

  164                 </bindings>

  165             </site>

3. Prepare the application in your application folder (C:\inetpub\wwwroot\WasServices)

Create a service file (WasServices.svc) that points to your existing WCF service library:

    1 <%@ ServiceHost Service="WasServices.Service1" %>

 

Create a web.config file that specifies the service's endpoints:

    1 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

    2 <configuration>

    3     <system.serviceModel>

    4         <services>

    5             <service name="WasServices.Service1"

    6                     behaviorConfiguration="MEX">

    7                 <endpoint address="wsHttp"

    8                           binding="wsHttpBinding"

    9                           contract="WasServices.IService1"/>

   10                 <endpoint address="netTcp"

   11                           binding="netTcpBinding"

   12                           bindingConfiguration="NetTcpBinding_Common"

   13                           contract="WasServices.IService1"/>

   14                 <endpoint address="mex"

   15                           binding="mexHttpBinding"

   16                           contract="IMetadataExchange" />

   17             </service>

   18         </services>

   19         <behaviors>

   20             <serviceBehaviors>

   21                 <behavior name="MEX">

   22                     <serviceMetadata httpGetEnabled="true"/>

   23                 </behavior>

   24             </serviceBehaviors>

   25         </behaviors>

   26         <bindings>

   27             <netTcpBinding>

   28                 <binding name="NetTcpBinding_Common">

   29                     <reliableSession enabled="true"/>

   30                     <security mode="None"/>

   31                 </binding>

   32             </netTcpBinding>

   33         </bindings>

   34     </system.serviceModel>

   35 </configuration>

 

Place the release-compiled DLL created from the WCF Service Library in a new folder named Bin.

4. At this point, you can browse and see the familiar "You have created a service." page for Service1.

5. Write your proxy file and config file.

WAS and IIS7 decide the address for your service, and it is not intuitive.

    1 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>

    2 <configuration>

    3     <system.serviceModel>

    4         <client>

    5             <endpoint address="net.tcp://localhost/WasServices/WasServices.svc/netTcp"

    6                       binding="netTcpBinding"

    7                       bindingConfiguration="NetTcpBinding_IService1"

    8                       contract="WasServices.IService1"

    9                       name="NetTcpBinding_Common" />

   10         </client>

   11         <bindings>

   12             <netTcpBinding>

   13                 <binding name="NetTcpBinding_Common">

   14                     <reliableSession enabled="true" />

   15                     <security mode="None" />

   16                 </binding>

   17             </netTcpBinding>

   18         </bindings>

   19     </system.serviceModel>

   20 </configuration>

 

The /netTcp at the end of the address is due to the address specified in the service's web.config file. The address was given there as simply netTcp. This is because IIS7 and WAS decide your address based on the available bindings and ports you specified in the applicationHost.config file using appcmd.exe. Since my enabled protocols are http and net.tcp and the only open tcp port is 808, you will not see a port number in the address. The same would go for my wsHttpBinding since the only allowable port is 80.

I'm proud to be the fourth, and maybe final, member of the "Got WAS to work" club. If anyone wants to join, and needs help to get in... please let me know.

Here are some helpful links for those of you having problems:

Friday, September 12, 2008 11:58:31 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #    Comments [8]   .NET Framework | C# | WAS | WCF  | 
# Saturday, September 06, 2008

I really need to read up on new features when a major release comes out. Just a few weeks ago I learned of a great "new" SQL 2005 function... ROW_NUMBER(). Just in time since SQL 2008 is already out.

For me, this function means a lot less temp tables. I would typically create a temp table with an ID INT IDENTITY(1,1) column to create an DisplayOrder, BatchID, etc. used to group or join on later. Books Online describes the function as "Returns the sequential number of a row within a partition of a result set, starting at 1 for the first row in each partition." The syntax is simple, and looks like:

ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY ID DESC)

For this example, the data I want to bring back with a DisplayOrder column looks like:

pers_subs_data

Without ROW_NUMBER(), using a table variable with an identity column:

DECLARE @Subs TABLE (DisplayOrder INT IDENTITY(1,1), [Address] VARCHAR(100), Operation VARCHAR(50), [Contract] VARCHAR(50))

INSERT INTO @Subs ([Address], Operation, [Contract])
SELECT [Address]
    , Operation
    , [Contract]
FROM PersistentSubscribers
WHERE Operation = 'OnEvent2'
ORDER BY ID DESC

SELECT * FROM @Subs

With ROW_NUMBER(), look how beautiful:

SELECT DisplayOrder = ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY ID DESC)
    , [Address]
    , Operation
    , [Contract]
FROM PersistentSubscribers
WHERE Operation = 'OnEvent2'

The results from both methods looks like:

 

row_number_results

Saturday, September 06, 2008 10:33:25 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #    Comments [8]   SQL  | 
# Sunday, August 31, 2008

Why clutter your inbox with error messages? Why make special code provisions for users to receive error messages via email? Why not log your error messages and have users subscribe to receive them in their favorite RSS aggregator?

If you are logging your exceptions already, you may find it easier to provide a syndication service. The process is ridiculously simple, and starts by creating a new project using the "Syndication Service Library" template. This template creates everything for you. All you need to do now is fill the SyndicationFeed with SyndicationItem objects.

Add a new class file called Feeds.cs:

 

    1 using System;

    2 using System.Linq;

    3 using System.ServiceModel;

    4 using System.ServiceModel.Syndication;

    5 using System.ServiceModel.Web;

    6 

    7 namespace SyndicationService

    8 {

    9     [ServiceContract]

   10     [ServiceKnownType(typeof(Atom10FeedFormatter))]

   11     [ServiceKnownType(typeof(Rss20FeedFormatter))]

   12     public interface IFeeds

   13     {

   14         [OperationContract]

   15         [WebGet(UriTemplate = "{type}?env={env}&app={app}", BodyStyle = WebMessageBodyStyle.Bare)]

   16         SyndicationFeedFormatter CreateFeed(string type, string env, string app);

   17     }

   18 

   19     public class Feeds : IFeeds

   20     {

   21         public SyndicationFeedFormatter CreateFeed(string type, string env, string app)

   22         {

   23             SyndicationFeed feed = CreateSyndicationFeed(type, env, app);

   24 

   25             // Return ATOM or RSS based on query string

   26             // rss -> http://localhost:8000/Feeds/Errors?env=Production&app=MyAppName

   27             // atom -> http://localhost:8000/Feeds/Errors?env=Production&app=MyAppName&format=atom

   28             string query = WebOperationContext.Current.IncomingRequest.UriTemplateMatch.QueryParameters["format"];

   29             SyndicationFeedFormatter formatter = null;

   30             if (query == "atom")

   31             {

   32                 formatter = new Atom10FeedFormatter(feed);

   33             }

   34             else

   35             {

   36                 formatter = new Rss20FeedFormatter(feed);

   37             }

   38 

   39             return formatter;

   40         }

   41 

   42         private static SyndicationFeed CreateSyndicationFeed(string type, string env, string app)

   43         {

   44             SyndicationFeed feed;

   45             switch (type.ToLower())

   46             {

   47                 case "errors":

   48                     feed = CreateErrorsFeed(type, env, app);

   49                     break;

   50                 default:

   51                     feed = new SyndicationFeed(

   52                         String.Format("Feed is unavailable - Type: {0} / Environment: {1} / Application: {2}",

   53                         type, env, app), null, null);

   54                     break;

   55             }

   56             return feed;

   57         }

   58 

   59         private static SyndicationFeed CreateErrorsFeed(string type, string env, string app)

   60         {

   61             ApplicationLogDataContext db = new ApplicationLogDataContext();

   62 

   63             SyndicationFeed feed = new SyndicationFeed

   64             {

   65                 Title = new TextSyndicationContent(String.Format("{0} {1} {2}", env, app, type)),

   66                 Description = new TextSyndicationContent(

   67                     String.Format("Application error syndication for the {0} applicaiton ({1}).", app, env)),

   68                 Items = from e in db.Exceptions

   69                         where e.Environment == env && e.Application == app

   70                         select new SyndicationItem

   71                         {

   72                             Title = new TextSyndicationContent(e.Message),

   73                             Content = new TextSyndicationContent(e.StackTrace)

   74                         }

   75             };

   76             return feed;

   77         }

   78     }

   79 }

Modify the App.config file:

 

    1 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>

    2 <configuration>

    3     <configSections>

    4     </configSections>

    5     <connectionStrings>

    6         <add name="SyndicationService.Properties.Settings.ApplicationLogConnectionString"

    7             connectionString="Data Source=Scorpion;Initial Catalog=ApplicationLog;Integrated Security=True"

    8             providerName="System.Data.SqlClient" />

    9     </connectionStrings>

   10     <system.serviceModel>

   11         <services>

   12             <service name="SyndicationService.Feeds">

   13                 <host>

   14                     <baseAddresses>

   15                         <add baseAddress="http://localhost:8000/" />

   16                     </baseAddresses>

   17                 </host>

   18                 <endpoint contract="SyndicationService.IFeeds"

   19                           address="Feeds"

   20                           binding="webHttpBinding"

   21                           behaviorConfiguration="WebHttpBinding_Common"/>

   22             </service>

   23         </services>

   24         <behaviors>

   25             <endpointBehaviors>

   26                 <behavior name="WebHttpBinding_Common">

   27                     <webHttp/>

   28                 </behavior>

   29             </endpointBehaviors>

   30         </behaviors>

   31     </system.serviceModel>

   32 </configuration>

You will need to adjust your project's Debug options to have command arguments that look similar to the following to F5-debug your service.

"/client:iexplore.exe" "/clientArgs:http://localhost:8000/Feeds/Errors?env=Production&app=GeoTracker"

Press F5 to test it out.

Here is the IE7 RSS viewer:

IE7_RSS_Viewer

Here is your RSS aggregator viewing the same feed:

RSS_Aggregator

You will, of course, want to add some additional information to the content of your SyndidationItem, a bogus phrase works for this example.

Also, it is unusual that you would care to keep your exception details around for a long period of time. Since this is a syndicated feed of application errors, you should make special arrangements to archive or delete your exception log on a regular basis. This will not only keep your insert and select times low, but will also alleviate the burden placed on a new subscriber when all of the exceptions from the database appear at once. An alternative would also be to modify the LINQ in the code above to only bring back exceptions from the last 7-60 days depending on your counts. I already archive my exceptions to a master exception repository for all environments by way of an ETL job. This way I can report on my errors without disturbing the live environments too.

Sunday, August 31, 2008 3:37:38 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #    Comments [4]   .NET Framework | C# | LINQ | WCF  | 
# Tuesday, August 26, 2008

I decided to come out of my cave and look around 3.5 a bit. I haven't read much about extension methods, but find them quite useful. They are nothing more than a syntactically superior static helper method. Let's look at a quick example so I can get back to coming up with more excuses to use them everywhere.

I like to batch my database calls as much as possible to avoid repeated opening/closing of connections, etc. To do this, I pass a bunch of ID values into a stored procedure as a comma-separated string. In the stored proc, I break the string apart with everyone's favorite table-valued function fn_MakeTable() to make a table of IDs. Then I can JOIN, UPDATE, or INSERT as needed.

So let's say I have a collection of Orders which I can easily convert to an array of OrderID integers with LINQ. My new best friend to create a comma-separated string of OrderIDs is the following.

    1 using System;

    2 using System.Configuration;

    3 

    4 namespace Common

    5 {

    6     public static class ArrayHelper

    7     {

    8         public static string ToCsv<T>(this T[] array)

    9         {

   10             Converter<T, string> converter = (t) =>

   11                 {

   12                     return t.ToString();

   13                 };

   14             return ToCsv(array, converter);

   15         }

   16 

   17         public static string ToCsv<T>(this T[] array, Converter<T, string> converter)

   18         {

   19             CommaDelimitedStringCollection csv = new CommaDelimitedStringCollection();

   20             foreach (T t in array)

   21             {

   22                 csv.Add(converter(t));

   23             }

   24             return csv.ToString();

   25         }

   26     }

   27 }

 

You'll see that I have two ToCsv() methods. The first takes a generic array using the this keyword and uses .ToString() as a default converter to string. The second method requires you to additionally pass in a converter to convert the object of type T to a string. Take those converted strings, add them to a CommaDelimitedStringCollection and .ToString() that collection to a full CSV string of integer values.

There are two ways to call these extension methods. The first is the more familiar way. Since they are really nothing more than static helper methods, call them just like any other:

   14             int[] array = { 123, 456 };

   15             string csv = Common.ArrayHelper.ToCsv(array);

 

The second is the more elegant and more intuitive way. Call it as if it was built into the Framework:

   14             int[] array = { 123, 456 };

   15             string csv = array.ToCsv();

 

You may be wondering, what if I write a method that matches the signature of a built-in method like .ToString(). Well, the built-in methods take precedence over extension methods, so array.ToString() will still appear as System.Int32[]. To get your new meaning of .ToString(), you just have to call it in the static helper method way detailed above.

For a generic array of T, you will likely want to provide your own Converter if T's .ToString() method does not display the information you want to show in the CSV string. Below is a lame example of a converter. It takes the int value, converts it to the char value.

   21             Converter<int, string> converter = (i) =>

   22             {

   23                 return ((char)i).ToString();

   24             };

   25             string csv = array.ToCsv(converter);

 

I think something so simple, and definitely re-usable, would benefit any developer.

Tuesday, August 26, 2008 9:07:12 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #    Comments [13]   .NET Framework | C# | LINQ  | 

"Opportunity is missed by most because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work"

- Thomas Alva Edison

Tuesday, August 26, 2008 1:22:03 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #    Comments [3]   Quotes  | 
# Saturday, August 23, 2008

Our friends at Microsoft may have slipped one in on us. After installing the 3.5 Framework Service Pack 1, it appears that you no longer need the [DataContract] or [DataMember] attributes on your DataContracts and DataMembers. I'm not sure what the motivation was for this "enhancement", but it caused some trouble for me the other day.

For this example I will be using the base project VS2008 gives you when you create a new WCF Service Library. I am simply adding a NestedType to the CompositeType given in the base project.

Before installing SP1, having code as it appears below would cause an error during Metadata Exchange that reads something like "Metadata contains a reference that cannot be resolved". Notice that CompositeType's NestedObject is marked as [DataMember] and also notice that the NestedType class is not marked as [DataContract] and has no [DataMember] attributes. Adding [DataContract] on NestedType and [DataMember] on IsVisible will clear this error and everything will work as expected. 

   24     [DataContract]

   25     public class CompositeType

   26     {

   27         bool boolValue = true;

   28         string stringValue = "Hello ";

   29         NestedType nestedObject = new NestedType();

   30 

   31         [DataMember]

   32         public bool BoolValue

   33         {

   34             get { return boolValue; }

   35             set { boolValue = value; }

   36         }

   37 

   38         [DataMember]

   39         public string StringValue

   40         {

   41             get { return stringValue; }

   42             set { stringValue = value; }

   43         }

   44 

   45         [DataMember]

   46         public NestedType NestedObject

   47         {

   48             get { return nestedObject; }

   49             set { nestedObject = value; }

   50         }

   51     }

   52 

   53     public class NestedType

   54     {

   55         bool isVisible = false;

   56 

   57         public bool IsVisible

   58         {

   59             get { return isVisible; }

   60             set { isVisible = value; }

   61         }

   62     }

 

The same code in use after SP1 will not cause this error. WCF will interpret from CompositeType's [DataContract] attribute and NestedObject's [DataMember] attribute that you meant to put [DataContract] on NestedType. So what's the big deal, right? WCF is doing me a solid by guessing at what I meant to do. To me, this violates the repeated opt-in theme present in WCF. For every other important decision, the developer must write code to opt-in to a feature. For example, TransactionFlow defaults to false so we don't use the client's incoming transaction with explicitly writing code that says to do so.

This is clearly not on the same level as TransactionFlow. But why does it assume something about my objects? Why does it assume that every member of my object should be a DataMember?

I noticed this new "feature" when troubleshooting some code that had different namespace names specified in the DataContract attribute. Since the NestedType did not have a [DataContract] attribute, the namespace was using the original namespace name. The equivalent of CompositeType came through correctly, but the NestedObject had no value.

Saturday, August 23, 2008 8:57:49 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #    Comments [8]   .NET Framework | C# | WCF  | 
Copyright © 2010 Scott Klueppel. All rights reserved.